Reproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation.

Printer-friendly version
TitleReproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Authorsvan der Zee CH, Priesterbach AR, van der Dussen L, Kap A, Schepers VPM, Visser-Meily JMA, Post MWM
Abbrev. JournalJ Rehabil Med
JournalJournal of rehabilitation medicine
Year of Publication2010
Volume42
Issue8
Pagination752-7
Publication Languageeng
KeywordsActivities of Daily Living, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Disabled Persons, Female, Humans, International Classification of Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Patient Participation, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Self Concept
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of 3 participation measures.

DESIGN: Repeated administration of a postal questionnaire with a 2-week interval.

PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients (n = 47) from 2 rehabilitation centres and a university hospital in The Netherlands.

METHODS: Measures were the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener (IMPACT-S), the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P). Test-retest reliability was analysed using Cohen's weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement was expressed as the standard error of measurement and the smallest detectable change (SDC), substantiated as the ratio between the SDC and the standard deviation (SDC/SD).

RESULTS: ICC values of the IMPACT-S were 0.54-0.90 for the scale scores, 0.92 and 0.74 for sub-total scores Activities and Participation, and 0.88 for the total score. The ICC of the Participation Scale was 0.82. The ICC of the USER-P was 0.65 for the Frequency scale, 0.85 for the Restrictions scale, and 0.84 for the Satisfaction scale. The SDC/SD ratios for all measures were small (0.11-0.28) at the group level, but large (0.78-1.91) at the individual level. Most participants found all measures relevant and easy to complete.

CONCLUSION: All 3 measures showed generally satisfying reproducibility and were acceptable to the participants.

PubMed URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20809057?dopt=Abstract

DOI10.2340/16501977-0589
Download PDFhttp://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/?doi=10.2340/16501977-0589