02716nas a2200373 4500000000100000008004100001653003100042653001000073653002600083653002100109653001100130653001100141653004500152653000900197653001600206653003700222653002600259653001900285653003100304653001700335100001000352700002000362700001300382700001000395700001800405700001900423700001100442245021800453856007300671300001000744490000700754520156700761022001402328 2010 d10aActivities of Daily Living10aAdult10aDisability Evaluation10aDisabled Persons10aFemale10aHumans10aInternational Classification of Diseases10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aOutcome Assessment (Health Care)10aPatient Participation10aQuestionnaires10aReproducibility of Results10aSelf Concept1 aZee C1 aPriesterbach AR1 aDussen L1 aKap A1 aSchepers VP M1 aVisser-Meily J1 aPost M00aReproducibility of three self-report participation measures: The ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener, the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation. uhttp://www.medicaljournals.se/jrm/content/?doi=10.2340/16501977-0589 a752-70 v423 a

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reproducibility of 3 participation measures.

DESIGN: Repeated administration of a postal questionnaire with a 2-week interval.

PARTICIPANTS: Outpatients (n = 47) from 2 rehabilitation centres and a university hospital in The Netherlands.

METHODS: Measures were the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener (IMPACT-S), the Participation Scale, and the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P). Test-retest reliability was analysed using Cohen's weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement was expressed as the standard error of measurement and the smallest detectable change (SDC), substantiated as the ratio between the SDC and the standard deviation (SDC/SD).

RESULTS: ICC values of the IMPACT-S were 0.54-0.90 for the scale scores, 0.92 and 0.74 for sub-total scores Activities and Participation, and 0.88 for the total score. The ICC of the Participation Scale was 0.82. The ICC of the USER-P was 0.65 for the Frequency scale, 0.85 for the Restrictions scale, and 0.84 for the Satisfaction scale. The SDC/SD ratios for all measures were small (0.11-0.28) at the group level, but large (0.78-1.91) at the individual level. Most participants found all measures relevant and easy to complete.

CONCLUSION: All 3 measures showed generally satisfying reproducibility and were acceptable to the participants.

 a1651-2081