Type
. Integration of eye care into a leprosy hospital service: experience in Mangu, Nigeria. Leprosy review [Internet]. 2004;75(1):103-4. Available from: https://leprosyreview.org/article/75/1/10-3104
Type
. Dermatology in Nigeria: evolution, establishment and current status. International journal of dermatology. 2004;43(3):223-8.
Type
. Global and local contexts: the Northern Ogoja Leprosy Scheme, Nigeria, 1945-1960. Historia, ciencias, saude--Manguinhos. 2003;10(Suppl 1):209-23.
Type
. Patient and health services delay in the diagnosis of leprosy in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Leprosy review [Internet]. 2003;74(3):282-3. Available from: https://leprosyreview.org/article/74/3/28-2283
Type
. Leprosy: from the clinics of a tertiary institution in South Eastern Nigeria. Leprosy review [Internet]. 2003;74(3):279. Available from: https://leprosyreview.org/article/74/3/27-9279
Type
. Field treatment of leprosy reactions in Northern Nigeria: feasibility, including the use of prednisolone in blister packs. Leprosy review [Internet]. 2003;74(3):259-62. Available from: https://leprosyreview.org/article/74/3/25-9262
Type
. Prevalence of HIV-1 infection among patients with leprosy and pulmonary tuberculosis in a semi-arid region, Nigeria. The journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health. 2003;123(2):117-9.
Type
. Leprosy control in the post leprosaria abolition years in Nigeria: reasons for default and irregular attendance at treatment centres. West African journal of medicine [Internet]. 2002;21(3):188-91. Available from: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/wajm/article/view/28025
Type
. Patient and health services delay in the diagnosis of leprosy in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Leprosy review [Internet]. 2003;74(1):79-82. Available from: https://leprosyreview.org/article/74/1/07-982
Type
. Male-female (sex) differences in leprosy patients in south eastern Nigeria: females present late for diagnosis and treatment and have higher rates of deformity. Leprosy review [Internet]. 2002;73(3):262-7. Available from: https://leprosyreview.org/article/73/3/26-2267