TY - JOUR KW - Drug Therapy, Combination KW - Female KW - Humans KW - India KW - Leprostatic Agents KW - leprosy KW - Male KW - Mycobacterium leprae KW - Patient Selection KW - Predictive Value of Tests KW - Prognosis KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic KW - Sensitivity and Specificity KW - Treatment Outcome AU - Vijayakumaran P AU - Krishnamurthy P AU - Rao P AU - Declerq E AB -
Because of the great efficacy of multidrug therapy (MDT), it had been hoped that the widespread use of MDT would bring about a rapid decrease of the incidence of leprosy. To the present, a decrease of incidence has not been observed, possibly because of the long incubation period of the disease, and because general implementation of MDT is still recent. Other reasons, such as environmental sources of infection or the role of healthy carriers in transmitting Mycobacterium leprae, cannot be excluded. Therefore, one must seek alternative or supplementary strategies, such as chemoprophylaxis. Household contacts of leprosy patients are at greater risk of developing leprosy than is the general population. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial of chemoprophylaxis, using a single 10 mg/kg dose of rifampicin, or a placebo, is planned in nine projects in India, among the household contacts of newly detected leprosy patients. Based upon assumptions of a protective efficacy of the chemoprophylaxis of 50%, an annual incidence of 2 per 1000 contacts, a desired power of the study of 90%, and a level of significance of 95%, 15,000 household contacts will be allocated randomly by household to each arm of the study, and followed for 5 years. Considered as household contacts will be all persons living in the same household as an index case and sharing the same kitchen. Pregnant women and infants will be excluded. To be certain that transmission of the organisms from the index case cannot occur once the prophylaxis is administered, rifampicin will be administered 2 months after diagnosis of the index case. Diagnosis of leprosy will be clinical, and confirmed independently. Although household contacts usually constitute only a small proportion of the new patients detected in a control programme, their high-risk status makes them particularly appropriate for a study of the potential effect of chemoprophylaxis. Following the trial, one could evaluate the usefulness and feasibility of using the same strategy in other population-groups, based on the number of persons necessary to treat to prevent one case.
BT - Leprosy review C1 - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11201885?dopt=Abstract CN - Infolep Library - available DA - 2000 Dec DO - 10.5935/0305-7518.20000065 J2 - Lepr Rev LA - eng N2 -Because of the great efficacy of multidrug therapy (MDT), it had been hoped that the widespread use of MDT would bring about a rapid decrease of the incidence of leprosy. To the present, a decrease of incidence has not been observed, possibly because of the long incubation period of the disease, and because general implementation of MDT is still recent. Other reasons, such as environmental sources of infection or the role of healthy carriers in transmitting Mycobacterium leprae, cannot be excluded. Therefore, one must seek alternative or supplementary strategies, such as chemoprophylaxis. Household contacts of leprosy patients are at greater risk of developing leprosy than is the general population. Therefore, a randomized, controlled trial of chemoprophylaxis, using a single 10 mg/kg dose of rifampicin, or a placebo, is planned in nine projects in India, among the household contacts of newly detected leprosy patients. Based upon assumptions of a protective efficacy of the chemoprophylaxis of 50%, an annual incidence of 2 per 1000 contacts, a desired power of the study of 90%, and a level of significance of 95%, 15,000 household contacts will be allocated randomly by household to each arm of the study, and followed for 5 years. Considered as household contacts will be all persons living in the same household as an index case and sharing the same kitchen. Pregnant women and infants will be excluded. To be certain that transmission of the organisms from the index case cannot occur once the prophylaxis is administered, rifampicin will be administered 2 months after diagnosis of the index case. Diagnosis of leprosy will be clinical, and confirmed independently. Although household contacts usually constitute only a small proportion of the new patients detected in a control programme, their high-risk status makes them particularly appropriate for a study of the potential effect of chemoprophylaxis. Following the trial, one could evaluate the usefulness and feasibility of using the same strategy in other population-groups, based on the number of persons necessary to treat to prevent one case.
PY - 2000 SP - S37 EP - 1 T2 - Leprosy review TI - Chemoprophylaxis against leprosy: expectations and methodology of a trial. UR - http://leprev.ilsl.br/pdfs/2000/v71s1/pdf/v71s1a08.pdf VL - 71 Suppl SN - 0305-7518 ER -