In recent years, as the prevalence of leprosy has declined and the tuberculosis epidemic has gained increasing attention, leprosy research has generally taken a 'back seat' to research in tuberculosis and other emerging and re-emerging infections. This has resulted as much from perceived differences of scientific opportunities in these fields as from differences of the disease burden. At the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH), research priority setting is typically based on a number of factors. In the case of leprosy research, the technical difficulties associated with this scientific area have clearly lessened enthusiasm for and progress in this field. Today, however, we are confronted by the reality of not having sufficient scientific understanding to explain a stable or increasing number of leprosy cases detected annually in the face of a dramatically decreasing total number of identified cases. We also lack adequate tools for diagnosis and prevention. At the same time, new molecular and cellular approaches and knowledge of the complete sequence of the genome of Mycobacterium leprae render leprosy research significantly more tractable than ever before. The combination of these factors has led a number of groups, including the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH, to review the current state of knowledge in leprosy research and draft recommendations for future leprosy research priorities. It is clear that many of the necessary and exciting research activities can best be addressed through collaborations among investigators, with control programmes, and among countries of high and low endemicity.
BT - Leprosy review C1 - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11201879?dopt=Abstract CN - Infolep Library - available DA - 2000 Dec DO - 10.5935/0305-7518.20000092 J2 - Lepr Rev LA - eng N2 -In recent years, as the prevalence of leprosy has declined and the tuberculosis epidemic has gained increasing attention, leprosy research has generally taken a 'back seat' to research in tuberculosis and other emerging and re-emerging infections. This has resulted as much from perceived differences of scientific opportunities in these fields as from differences of the disease burden. At the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH), research priority setting is typically based on a number of factors. In the case of leprosy research, the technical difficulties associated with this scientific area have clearly lessened enthusiasm for and progress in this field. Today, however, we are confronted by the reality of not having sufficient scientific understanding to explain a stable or increasing number of leprosy cases detected annually in the face of a dramatically decreasing total number of identified cases. We also lack adequate tools for diagnosis and prevention. At the same time, new molecular and cellular approaches and knowledge of the complete sequence of the genome of Mycobacterium leprae render leprosy research significantly more tractable than ever before. The combination of these factors has led a number of groups, including the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the NIH, to review the current state of knowledge in leprosy research and draft recommendations for future leprosy research priorities. It is clear that many of the necessary and exciting research activities can best be addressed through collaborations among investigators, with control programmes, and among countries of high and low endemicity.
PY - 2000 SP - S183 EP - 7 T2 - Leprosy review TI - Leprosy research--setting priorities and facilitating collaborations: a personal perspective. UR - http://leprev.ilsl.br/pdfs/2000/v71s1/pdf/v71s1a35.pdf VL - 71 Suppl SN - 0305-7518 ER -