The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, practicality and patient understanding of 5 methods used for testing sensation in leprosy patients, in a rural setting. The tests used were the WHO test, cottonwool, pin-prick, monofilaments and the biothesiometer. We concentrated on testing sensation in the hands, and the various tests were carried out on 75 patients and 32 controls, all taken from villagers living at Kindwitwi Leprosy Village, Tanzania. Our results showed that although the WHO test, cottonwool and pin-prick were all easy to use, cheap and well accepted they were not sensitive enough to be of any practical value. We found that the monofilaments, as well as being cheap and easy to use, had great potential value, as the 2-g monofilament could be used as a threshold value (indicative of leprosy, but not diagnostic) for protective sensation with a combined false-positive and false-negative value of only 4%. Finally, the biothesiometer was found to be a precise test that can accurately identify leprosy patients from controls and identify patients at risk of ulceration. It was, however, associated with its own problems, chiefly those of expense and its need of electricity, although we found this latter problem could be easily and relatively cheaply solved by the use of a solar powered recharger (Appendix).
BT - Leprosy review C1 - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7731342?dopt=Abstract CN - Infolep Library - available DA - 1995 Mar DO - 10.5935/0305-7518.19950008 IS - 1 J2 - Lepr Rev LA - eng N2 -The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, practicality and patient understanding of 5 methods used for testing sensation in leprosy patients, in a rural setting. The tests used were the WHO test, cottonwool, pin-prick, monofilaments and the biothesiometer. We concentrated on testing sensation in the hands, and the various tests were carried out on 75 patients and 32 controls, all taken from villagers living at Kindwitwi Leprosy Village, Tanzania. Our results showed that although the WHO test, cottonwool and pin-prick were all easy to use, cheap and well accepted they were not sensitive enough to be of any practical value. We found that the monofilaments, as well as being cheap and easy to use, had great potential value, as the 2-g monofilament could be used as a threshold value (indicative of leprosy, but not diagnostic) for protective sensation with a combined false-positive and false-negative value of only 4%. Finally, the biothesiometer was found to be a precise test that can accurately identify leprosy patients from controls and identify patients at risk of ulceration. It was, however, associated with its own problems, chiefly those of expense and its need of electricity, although we found this latter problem could be easily and relatively cheaply solved by the use of a solar powered recharger (Appendix).
PY - 1995 SP - 55 EP - 62 T2 - Leprosy review TI - Assessment of the methods available for testing sensation in leprosy patients in a rural setting. UR - http://leprev.ilsl.br/pdfs/1995/v66n1/pdf/v66n1a08.pdf VL - 66 SN - 0305-7518 ER -