02484nas a2200409 4500000000100000008004100001260001600042653002600058653002400084653002100108653000900129653000900138653001100147653001200158653001600170653000900186653002100195653002200216653002500238653003000263653003200293653002700325653002300352653000900375653002800384653001000412100001300422700001400435700001100449700001500460700002100475245008200496300001100578490000800589520146300597022001402060 2009 d c2009 May 1510aDisability Evaluation10aDisease Progression10aElectrodiagnosis10aFoot10aHand10aHumans10aleprosy10aNociceptors10aPain10aPain Measurement10aPeripheral nerves10aPhysical Stimulation10aPredictive Value of Tests10aSensitivity and Specificity10aSensory Receptor Cells10aSensory Thresholds10aSkin10aSomatosensory Disorders10aTouch1 aGomes FG1 aMarques W1 aFoss N1 aSantana LA1 aCipriani Frade M00aTactile threshold detection in leprosy patients with an electronic algometer. a319-220 v1793 a

OBJECTIVE: To propose an electronic method for sensitivity evaluation in leprosy and to compare it to the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.

METHODS: Thirty patients attending the Dermatology outpatient clinic of HCFMRP-USP were consecutively evaluated by both the electronic aesthesiometer and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments on hand and foot test points. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to determine the variability of the electronic measures and the Kappa coefficient was calculated to determine the agreement between methods according to their categories (altered and non-altered tactile sensitivity).

RESULTS: The ICC was approximately 1, demonstrating repeatability. The Kappa coefficient showed more than 75 and 63% agreement on the hand and foot points, respectively. The mean agreement between the 2 methods for the 7 points of the right and left hand was 77.14 and 75.71%, respectively. The mean agreement for all 10 points was 74.33 and 63.66% on the right and left foot, respectively. In cases of disagreement the detection of altered tactile sensitivity by the electronic esthesiometer on the right and left foot was 90.91 and 84.25%, respectively, with no detection by the monofilaments.

CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the electronic esthesiometer is a reliable and easy application, capable of evaluating alterations of tactile sensitivity in leprosy patients.

 a1872-678X