02589nas a2200373 4500000000100000008004100001260001300042653001900055653002900074653001200103653002500115653003000140653001900170653002400189653002200213100001400235700001300249700001400262700001300276700001500289700001300304700001300317700001400330700001300344700001300357700001300370700001400383700001300397245012100410300001100531490000600542520165300548022001402201 2008 d c2008 Sep10aDNA, Bacterial10aEnvironmental Monitoring10aleprosy10aMycobacterium leprae10apolymerase chain reaction10aRNA, Bacterial10aRNA, Ribosomal, 16S10aSoil Microbiology1 aLavania M1 aKatoch K1 aKatoch VM1 aGupta AK1 aChauhan DS1 aSharma R1 aGandhi R1 aChauhan V1 aBansal G1 aSachan P1 aSachan S1 aYadav V S1 aJadhav R00aDetection of viable Mycobacterium leprae in soil samples: insights into possible sources of transmission of leprosy. a627-310 v83 a
Leprosy has ceased to be a public health problem world wide, after the successful implementation of effective chemotherapy (MDT) and use of control measures. However, new cases of leprosy continue to occur. Mycobacterium leprae cannot be grown in any acceptable culture medium and besides the wild armadillos, there is no known animal reservoir for leprosy. The transmission of leprosy is believed to be due to a large extent by droplet discharge of bacilli through nose and mouth and to a lesser extent by direct contact of susceptible host with a patient for long duration. The exact role of the environment in the transmission dynamics is still speculative. In the present study, we have tried to detect viable M. leprae from soil samples in endemic areas by using molecular methods. Eighty soil samples were collected from villages of this area, DNA and RNA of M. leprae extracted and identified using specific M. leprae primers. PCR amplification was done and real-time RT-PCR was used to detect viable M. leprae. DNA targeting the 16S region of M. leprae was detected in 37.5%, whereas M. leprae RNA targeting the same region was detected in 35% of these samples. Of the total 80 samples, 40 were collected from residential areas of leprosy patients whereas 40 samples were from no-patient areas. Fifty-five percent positivity for 16S rRNA of M. leprae was observed from the "patient" area in comparison to 15% positivity from the "no-patient" area (p < 0.001). This study thus provides valuable information of presence of viable M. leprae in soil specimens, which would be of use in investigating the transmission dynamics in leprosy.
a1567-1348