02995nas a2200409 4500000000100000008004100001260001300042653001000055653000900065653001600074653001900090653003000109653001100139653001100150653002300161653001200184653000900196653001600205653002500221653001800246653003000264653002600294100001600320700001300336700001500349700001100364700001600375700001400391700001500405700001200420245014800432300001200580490000800592050001800600520195300618022001402571 2007 d c2007 Oct10aAdult10aAged10aDNA Primers10aDNA, Bacterial10aEye Infections, Bacterial10aFemale10aHumans10aLeprostatic Agents10aleprosy10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aMycobacterium leprae10aOphthalmology10apolymerase chain reaction10aRetrospective Studies1 aChaudhry IA1 aShamsi F1 aElzaridi E1 aAwad A1 aAl-Fraikh H1 aAl-Amry M1 aAl-Dhibi H1 aRiley F00aInitial diagnosis of leprosy in patients treated by an ophthalmologist and confirmation by conventional analysis and polymerase chain reaction. a1904-110 v114 aCHAUDHRY 20073 a

PURPOSE: To report the initial diagnosis of leprosy in patients seeking treatment from an ophthalmologist in a tertiary eye care center, its confirmation by histopathologic and polymerase chain reaction analysis, and review of literature.

DESIGN: Noncomparative retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients with no known history of leprosy who were selected based on either a clinical suspicion or a histopathologic diagnosis and were found to have ocular or periocular lesions suggestive of leprosy.

METHODS: Review of clinical records of patients with no known history of leprosy seen by an ophthalmologist at a tertiary eye care referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, presenting symptoms and signs, diagnostic studies, complications, and treatment.

RESULTS: Among the 6 patients (5 women and 1 man; average age, 55 years), only 2 were found to have leprosy from clinical examination alone. Histopathologic characteristics or demonstration of acid-fast bacilli, suggestive of leprosy, were found in 5 patients. Definite confirmation of leprosy was made by polymerase chain reaction performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of 4 patients having suspected leprosy based on clinicohistopathologic examination results.

CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of leprosy relies on the clinical symptom complex, epidemiologic factors, and demonstration of acid-fast bacilli in the tissue sample. Considering that the global leprosy population is 12 million, a patient with leprosy may be found anywhere. The ophthalmologist may be the first one to encounter such patient, in which case suspicion and detection of ocular findings may lead to early treatment of the infection. Polymerase chain reaction may be a new tool in the definite diagnosis of leprosy when suspicion of the diseases is raised by clinicohistopathologic studies.

 a1549-4713