02646nas a2200421 4500000000100000008004100001260001300042653001500055653001000070653000900080653001000089653002100099653002400120653002800144653002200172653002900194653001100223653001100234653001200245653001500257653000900272653001600281653002000297653002100317653001600338100002000354700002200374700002200396700002900418700001600447700002100463700001500484245006400499300001100563490000800574520162800582022001402210 2008 d c2008 Oct10aAdolescent10aAdult10aAged10aChild10aChild, Preschool10aClinical Competence10aCross-Sectional Studies10aDiagnostic Errors10aFalse Positive Reactions10aFemale10aHumans10aleprosy10aMadagascar10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aQuality Control10aSampling Studies10aYoung Adult1 aTiendrebéogo A1 aAndrianarisoa S-H1 aAndriamitantsoa J1 aVololoarinosinjatovo M-M1 aRanjalahy G1 aRatrimoarivony C1 aGuedenon A00a[Survey of the quality of leprosy diagnosis in Madagascar]. a645-500 v1353 a

BACKGROUND: By 2005, Madagascar had not achieved its goal of eliminating leprosy. During reexamination of leprosy patients, rates of diagnostic error ranged from 4.5 to 62%, casting doubt on the reported prevalence of leprosy. We therefore decided to carry out a survey of the quality of leprosy diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The survey consisted in reexamination of a sample of 102 new cases of leprosy (treated for less than three months). The sample was obtained from clusters of six patients, randomly drawn from the 111 districts in the country's six provinces. Two reexamination teams visited the target districts. Each team included at least three medical doctors: a doctor from the National Program, a WHO consultant and a dermatologist from partner NGOs in the program.

RESULTS: The mean false-positive rate was 27.5%, ranging from 5.6 to 44.4% in the different provinces. The quality of leprosy diagnosis was found to be very poor, particularly in districts with a marked decrease in annual detection of leprosy cases.

CONCLUSION: The high rate of false-positives during this survey could be due to the incompetence of peripheral health workers. This incompetence could be partly attributed to the decrease in leprosy detection, resulting in reduced familiarity of these health staff with leprosy diagnosis. Recommendations were made to the country concerning review of the leprosy case detection network and improvement of the quality of leprosy diagnosis in the field. Health workers involved in leprosy detection must have basic dermatological knowledge.

 a0151-9638