02779nas a2200373 4500000000100000008004100001260001300042653001000055653000900065653002200074653001300096653001800109653003700127653001100164653003100175653003100206653001100237653003700248653001200285653002500297653000900322653001600331653002600347653001200373653001700385100001600402700001400418700001700432245002400449300001000473490001400483520189400497022001402391 2006 d c2006 May10aAdult10aAged10aAged, 80 and over10aColombia10aConsanguinity10aDisease Transmission, Infectious10aFemale10aFoot Deformities, Acquired10aHand Deformities, Acquired10aHumans10aKeratoconjunctivitis, Infectious10aleprosy10aLeprosy, lepromatous10aMale10aMiddle Aged10aRetrospective Studies10aSpouses10aTime Factors1 aMeléndez E1 aFuentes J1 aRodríguez G00a[Conjugal leprosy]. a24-320 v8 Suppl 13 a

OBJECTIVES: Determining the occurrence of leprosy amongst couples and establishing the type of leprosy in index and secondary cases.

METHODS: The characteristics of leprosy were studied between 1980 and 2000 in Atlántico Department located on the Colombian Caribbean Coast. Clinical histories of patients registered in the Leprosy Control Programme were reviewed. Clinical exams were performed and personal interviews carried out with couples suffering from leprosy.

RESULTS: Twenty-six married couples were found to be suffering from leprosy, representing 5.4% of leprosy cases detected during the study period. They were aged from 20 to 89. 65.4% of the index cases were men and 22 (84.6%) were multibacillary, lepromatous cases; two had indeterminate leprosy and two were suffering from tuberculoid leprosy. Sixty-one percent of the secondary cases were paucibacillary patients, 42% of them being tuberculoid. No paucibacillary cases were associated with multibacillary leprosy in the couples. Only two couples had consanguinity. None of the couples had had leprosy at the time of being married. The time between leprosy being detected in index cases and the disease being detected in secondary patients varied from 5 to 40 years. Disabilities were more common in the feet and to a higher degree in lepromatous index cases who had had the disease for a longer time than the secondary cases because these were more frequently paucibacillary patients who had a disease having shorter evolution.

CONCLUSIONS: In spite of ongoing, prolonged contact, conjugal leprosy is not frequent and requires several years to develop in the second person. Lepromatous leprosy in index cases was more frequently associated with leprosy in the couple. When the primary case was paucibacillary, no multibacillary leprosy occurred in the secondary case.

 a0124-0064