01755nas a2200265   4500000000100000008004100001260001300042653001300055653000900068653001100077653001200088653001300100653002700113653002300140653002300163100001300186700001200199245011100211856005900322300001100381490000700392050001600399520106000415022001401475       1994                            d  c1994 Dec10aEthiopia10aHand10aHumans10aleprosy10aNeuritis10aNeurologic Examination10aObserver Variation10aSensory Thresholds1 aRijk A J1 aByass P00aField comparison of 10-g and 1-g filaments for the sensory testing of hands in Ethiopian leprosy patients.  uhttp://leprev.ilsl.br/pdfs/1994/v65n4/pdf/v65n4a06.pdf  a333-400 v65  aDERIJK1994B3 a<p>In ALERT's leprosy control programme sensory testing of hands and feet is done with a nylon filament giving a 10-g stimulus, but doubts arose that early partial sensory loss in hands would not thus be discovered. In order to evaluate the relative performance of 1-g and 10-g filaments for sensory testing on the palms of hands, both filaments were used separately in a series of 1,021 examinations on several consecutive occasions in 159 leprosy patients and 97 nonleprosy controls. The 1-g filament was always felt on normal hands and does not lead to false positive findings of nerve dysfunction. If the 1-g filament were used routinely, almost twice as many instances of 'neuritis' would be discovered and treated, if the criterion for diagnosis and treatment of new nerve dysfunction remained as it is for nerves tested with the 10-g filament. It appears desirable to distinguish between testing for early sensory loss and for loss of protective sensation. The two tests may each need their own instrument and separate recording of the results.</p>  a0305-7518