01615nas a2200325   4500000000100000008004100001260001300042653001000055653001000065653001100075653001100086653001000097653001200107653000900119653002000128653001900148653003200167653001700199653002500216100001600241700001600257700001300273245010000286856005100386300001000437490000700447050003200454520078900486022001401275       2002                            d  c2002 Mar10aAdult10aChild10aFemale10aHumans10aIndia10aleprosy10aMale10aQuality of Life10aRehabilitation10aSensitivity and Specificity10aSouth Africa10aTerminology as Topic1 aCornielje H1 aNicholls PG1 aVelema J00aAvoiding misperceptions: classifying rehabilitation projects using letters rather than numbers.  uhttps://leprosyreview.org/article/73/1/00-0007  a47-510 v73  aInfolep Library - available3 a<p>A classification system proposed earlier of the many different known rehabilitation approaches and activities used a quantitative scoring system, thus giving the impression that projects with a higher score were better, more correct or more important than projects with a lower score. We therefore propose an alternative classification based on letters, so that a given combination of letters characterizes a particular type of project. The letters are derived from four dimensions: desired outcome of the intervention, participation of the clients in the rehabilitation process, the target group served and the services offered. Some examples are presented. The classification serves to analyse rehabilitation projects, to define policy and as a starting point for evaluation.</p>  a0305-7518