01125nas a2200145   4500000000100000008004100001653001100042653001500053100001300068700001300081245009100094856006800185050001600253520071000269       2013                            d10aEthics10aDisability1 aVehmas S1 aWatson N00aMoral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability: a critique of critical disability studies  uhttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09687599.2013.831751  aVEHMAS 20133 a
This article examines and critiques the ideas found within critical disability 
studies (CDS). 

The article argues that the accounts offered by CDS do not engage fully with 
the key ethical and political issues faced by disabled people. 

 CDS does not examine how things ought to be for disabled people in terms of right and wrong, good and bad. Because of this omission it is not able to provide a good political or theoretical framework through which to discuss 
disability.

The paper argues that an examination of disability must involve an engagement with moral and political issues, and must be sensitive to individual experiences as well as the social, material and economic circumstances.