02757nas a2200373 4500000000100000008004100001260001700042653001500059653001000074653001100084653001000095653002100105653001100126653001100137653001200148653002500160653001400185653004000199653002600239653002600265653001600291100001800307700001600325700002000341700001200361700001700373245008100390856007500471300001100546490000700557050001700564520178800581022001402369 2013 d c2013 Jul-Aug10aAdolescent10aAdult10aBrazil10aChild10aEndemic Diseases10aFemale10aHumans10aleprosy10aLongitudinal studies10aPregnancy10aPregnancy Complications, Infectious10aRetrospective Studies10aSocioeconomic Factors10aYoung Adult1 aPalacios VRCM1 aBichara CNC1 aSilva Junior JB1 aDias RS1 aGoncalves NV00aLeprosy and pregnancy in the State of Pará: an epidemiological perspective. uhttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/rsbmt/2013nahead/0037-8682-rsbmt-00-00-21.pdf a453-600 v46 aPALACIOS20133 a

INTRODUCTION: A few older publications describe leprosy associated with pregnancy, a situation that has been linked to leprosy exacerbation. This study aimed to describe the detection rate of this association in the State of Pará by county and Integration Region (IR) from 2007 to 2009 via an analysis of socio demographic, epidemiological and operational indices.

METHODS: This was a descriptive study using information generated by the SINAN. The Detection Coefficient of the Leprosy and Pregnancy Association (DCLP) epidemiological index was constructed to help interpret the endemicity parameters. The disease was considered hyperendemic when greater than two cases per 10,000 inhabitants were identified.

RESULTS: During the study period,149 associations were detected, with 14 hyperendemic counties: seven in 2007, fi ve in 2008 and two in 2009. The Carajás Integrated Region displayed the highest DCLP index in the period. Eldorado dos Carajás had the single highest DCLP index(5.7/10,000 inhabitants, 2008), whereas the DCLP index in Conceição do Araguaia was very high in all three years. However,most counties displayed low or medium DCLP indices. The annual averages were 0.31 DCLP (2007), bass; 0.30 (2008), bass and 0.19 (2009), bass. The average DCLP index was 0.26, which is considered low. Three clusters of medium endemicity were identified by the average DCLP in the study period.

CONCLUSIONS: The analyses indicated that the surveillance program is still unsatisfactory in Pará. The interpretation of the endemicity parameters enabled qualitative and quantitative analyses to determine the epidemiological panorama of this association. The identification of high endemicity requires further clarification.

 a1678-9849