01747nas a2200397 4500000000100000008004100001260001300042653001100055653002200066653001100088653003500099653002300134653001400157653001100171653001400182653001200196653000900208653002800217653001800245653002600263653001700289653001600306653002400322100001600346700001500362700001600377700001300393700001100406700001300417245009300430856008200523300001100605490000600616520071300622022001401335 2012 d c2012 Sep10aBrazil10aDisease Outbreaks10aFemale10aGeographic Information Systems10aGeographic Mapping10aGeography10aHumans10aIncidence10aleprosy10aMale10aNervous System Diseases10aPublic health10aRetrospective Studies10aRisk Factors10aSex Factors10aStatistics as Topic1 aOliveira DT1 aBezerra MM1 aAlmeida JAP1 aDuthie M1 aReed S1 aJesus AR00aNeurological disability in leprosy: incidence and gender association in Sergipe, Brazil. uhttp://www.geospatialhealth.unina.it/articles/v6i3/gh-v6i3-16-de-oliveira.pdf aS125-90 v63 a

The environmental impact assessment process is over 40 years old and has dramatically expanded. Topics, such as social, health and human rights impact are now included. The main body of an impact analysis is generally hundreds of pages long and supported by countless technical appendices. For large, oil/gas, mining and water resources projects both the volume and technical sophistication of the reports has far exceeded the processing ability of host communities. Instead of informing and empowering, the reports are abstruse and overwhelming. Reinvention is required. The development of a visual integrated impact assessment strategy that utilizes remote sensing and spatial analyses is described.

 a1970-7096