02063nas a2200205   4500000000100000008004100001653001200042653001200054653001600066653002000082653001700102653002100119100001400140700001500154700001400169245004900183300001200232490000600244520160700250       2011                            d10aSlavery10aleprosy10aLegislation10aDrognat-Landré10aContagionism10aAnticontagionism1 aMenke H E1 aSnelders S1 aPieters T00aLeprosy control and contagionism in Suriname  a168-1750 v23 aLeprosy is nowadays a disappearing but not yet defeated disease in Suriname. In colonial times it was a burden for colonial government and people, the majority of patients in preabolition times being slaves. In the 18th century a control system was established, with detection and isolation, anchored in legislation, as major methods. Dutch physicians working in Suriname in the 18th and first half of the 19th century proposed contingent contagionistic models, according to which leprosy was caused by a mixture of factors, infection being one of them. But in the first half of the 19th century European researchers generally denied infection as the cause of leprosy and the paradigm of anti-contagionism prevailed, considering heredity and environmental factors as its cause. At the same time in Suriname - because leprosy appeared uncontrollable - the fight against the disease was reinforced by promulgating more relentless laws to hunt and identify lepers. In line with this, the Suriname born Charles Louis Drognat-Landré defended the view thesis Utrecht that infection is the one and only cause of leprosy. His extreme contagionism was sharply rejected in The Netherlands, but then he published his ideas in French and so could reach the international scene and influence the Norwegian Hansen. The latter discovered the culpable micro-organism a few years later. We claim a correlation between the development of a typical Surinamese form of contagionism, the brutal leprosy control system and the autocratic, non-liberal towards the slaves political structure of the Dutch colony Suriname.