01999nas a2200325 4500000000100000008004100001260001700042653001200059653001200071653003300083653003100116653003000147653001600177653001100193653001200204653000900216653003200225653002500257653002700282100001500309700001600324700001400340700002700354245013500381856004100516300001100557490000700568520108400575022001401659 1975 d c1975 Oct-Dec10aAnimals10aDapsone10aDrug Administration Schedule10aDrug Resistance, Microbial10aDrug Therapy, Combination10aEthionamide10aHumans10aleprosy10aMice10aMicrobial Sensitivity Tests10aMycobacterium leprae10aSulfamethoxypyridazine1 aPattyn S R1 aRollier M T1 aRollier R1 aVerdoolaeghe-Van Loo G00a[Sensitivity to dapsone, sulfamethoxypyridazine and ethionamide of mycobacterium leprae taken from patients treated by the drugs]. uhttp://ila.ilsl.br/pdfs/v43n4a09.pdf a356-630 v433 a
Suspensions of M. leprae from skin biopsies of patients treated with dapsone (DDS) (four cases), sulfamethoxypyridazine (SMP) (six cases), and ethionamide (ETH) (seven cases), were inoculated into mouse foot pads and their sensitivity for the different drugs determined. Two strains were DDS resistant. Resistance appeared after 13 and 14 years respectively after the start of treatment. Five strains were isolated from patients treated with SMP. Relapses during sulfonamide treatment are considered to be due to the low effective serum concentrations reached by SMP, a situation which is aggravated by irregularities in drug intake. Fortunately all strains were sensitive to SMP and DDS as well. Four strains were ETH resistant. ETH resistance at the present moment reaches 4% and appeared in two cases six years after the start of treatment. It is concluded that SMP is not indicated for the treatment of multibacillary leprosy and that ETH can be used only in association with other drugs during the introductory phase of treatment of multibacillary forms of leprosy.
a0148-916X